论文部分内容阅读
目的:评价健身气功·大舞练习与健身走锻炼对女大学生原发性痛经的疗效,并探讨健身气功·大舞干预原发性痛经的机理。方法:将136名原发性痛经的女大学生随机分为健身气功组(68名)和健身走组(68名)。观察组进行健身气功·大舞练习,对照组进行健身走锻炼,两组练习时间均为4个月经周期,观察两组疼痛评分及疗效。结果:随干预时间延长,两组疼痛评分均呈逐渐下降趋势;两组组间比较,干预后第1、2个月经周期,两组疼痛评分无明显差异(P均>0.05);在干预后第3、4个月经周期,健身气功组疼痛评分低于健身走组(P均<0.05);经4个月经周期的干预后,两组总有效率有统计学意义(<0.05);健身气功组痊愈率为75.0%,健身走组痊愈率为48.5%,两者差异有显著统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论:健身气功·大舞练习和健身走锻炼对原发性痛经均有显著的疗效,前者效果优于后者,且健身效应广泛,能达到防治原发性痛经目的。
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of Health Qigong, big dance and body-building exercises on primary dysmenorrhea in female college students and to explore the mechanism of Health Qigong and big dance on primary dysmenorrhea. Methods: Female students of primary dysmenorrhea were divided into Health Qigong group (68) and Fitness walking group (68). The observation group conducted exercises of Health Qigong and Big Dance, while the control group exercised and walked. The exercise time of the two groups was 4 menstrual cycles, and the pain scores and the curative effects of the two groups were observed. Results: With the prolongation of intervention time, the pain scores of both groups showed a gradual downward trend. There was no significant difference between the two groups in the first and second menstrual cycle after the intervention (P> 0.05) The pain scores in Health Qigong group were lower than those in Health walking group in the third and fourth menstrual cycles (P <0.05). After 4 menstrual cycles, the total effective rate was statistically significant (<0.05) The cure rate was 75.0% in the group and 48.5% in the fitness group, the difference was statistically significant (P <0.01). Conclusion: Health Qigong · Big Dance practice and walking exercises have significant effect on primary dysmenorrhea. The former is superior to the latter and has a wide range of fitness effects and can achieve the purpose of preventing and treating primary dysmenorrhea.