随着《物权法》的出台,民众及法学界最关注的是物的归属及变动,其中,物权行为理论是物权变动无法回避的问题,争议的焦点是到底债权形式主义和物权形式主义哪个更合理,或者说,物权行为的独立性和无因性制度是否合理,本文从以下几个方面给予初步探讨。 With the promulgation of the Property Law, people and the legal profession are most concerned about the attribution and change of things, of which the theory of real rights and behavior is the unavoidable issue of real rights changes. The focus of the dispute is whether debt formalism or real rights formalism Which is more reasonable, or that the independence of property rights and non-reason system is reasonable, this article from the following aspects to give a preliminary discussion.