论文部分内容阅读
《反垄断法》是调整我国社会主义市场经济秩序的基本法律。近年来反垄断法实施效果不佳,作为舶来品的反垄断法无可避免地需要借鉴其他国家和地区的经验。通过对反垄断法规定刑事责任的理论基础分析,认为反垄断法实施效果不佳的原因并非源于刑事责任对垄断行为缺乏有效规制,更多的是由于现行反垄断法之规定缺乏对我国现实经济体制的反映,过度强调规则刑事化实则无益于反垄断法的有效实施。鉴于此,结合我国反垄断法及其规制的特殊性,将激励性规制作为增强我国反垄断法实施效果的路径,不仅能对市场经济进行回应,也能够实现对健康竞争秩序的有效保护,提升反垄断法的实施效果。
The “Anti-monopoly Law” is the basic law regulating the order of the socialist market economy in our country. In recent years, the antitrust law ineffectively implemented and the antitrust law as imported goods inevitably needs to learn from the experience of other countries and regions. Through analyzing the theoretical basis of the criminal responsibility of the antitrust law, it is considered that the reason why the antitrust law fails to work well is not due to the fact that the criminal liability lacks effective regulation of the monopoly act, but more because the current provisions of the antitrust law are not effective to our country’s reality The reflection of the economic system, excessive emphasis on criminalization of the rules is actually not conducive to the effective implementation of the antitrust law. In view of this, in light of the particularity of antitrust law and its regulation in our country, the incentive regulation as a way to enhance the implementation effect of antitrust law in our country can not only respond to the market economy but also effectively protect and enhance the healthy competition order Effectiveness of antitrust law.