论文部分内容阅读
关于英汉双宾构式的对比研究大都集中于“给予”义双宾动词和“给予”类双宾构式。鲜有学者针对英汉“取得”义动词与双宾构式互动的差异进行研究。本文在构式语法的基础上,从历时的角度,尝试通过追溯双宾构式在英语和汉语两种语言中的流变来考察这些差异。我们的研究结果表明:从古汉语到现代汉语的演变过程中虽然“取得”类双宾构式不是典型双宾构式,但是始终为常见构式,因而有相当数量的单音节“取得”义动词可以参与该构式;而从古英语到现代英语的嬗变过程中,get类“取得”义动词始终参与广义“给予”类双宾构式,obtain类“取得”义动词参与的三种“取得”义构式逐步消失,从而不能参与双宾构式,只能参与介词构式。
The contrastive studies of English and Chinese double-bin structure mostly focus on the double binomial structure of “give ” meaning double-object verb and “give ” class. Few scholars study the differences between English and Chinese “acquired ” verb and double object structure interaction. Based on the constructive grammar, this paper attempts to examine these differences by tracing the double-guest constructions in English and Chinese languages from diachronic perspective. Our results show that although the dubbing structure of “fetching ” is not a typical double-binomial structure in the evolution from ancient Chinese to modern Chinese, it is always a common structure and thus has a considerable number of monosyllabic “ In the evolution from Old English to Modern English, the get class ”get “ verb has always been involved in the generalized ”give “ double binomial structure, and the class ”obtain“ The three kinds of ”get“ meaning constructions of the ”get" verb participate gradually disappear, so they can not participate in the double binomial structure and can only participate in the prepositional structure.