余氏语言，干净有味，而较之平凹，则缺乏余味，橄榄式的回味。由此而见余光中先生，则其更相形见拙。写散文写诗也写评论的光中先生，语言有明显的躁气，节奏韵律的把握上也尚欠火候。但其诗人的思维和形式的运用又明显启迪于两位，故各有所长或气质使然也。二余是学者型，平 Yu’s language, clean and tasteful, and compared to the flat concave, the lack of aftertaste, olive aftertaste. From this see Mr. Yu Guangzhong, then it is even more clumsy. Writing essay writing poetry also write comments Mr. light, the language has a clear impatience, the rhythm of the grasp is not yet ready. However, the use of his poet’s thinking and form is obviously enlightened by two people, so each has his own director or temperament. More than two scholar-type, flat