读了《人民司法》１９９９年第１２期《论民事抗诉再审中抗诉机关的举证责任》一文,有些不同看法。笔者认为,在民事抗诉再审案件中,抗诉机关不负举证责任,亦无调查收集证据之职能。抗诉机关在民事抗诉再审案件中负举证责任之说,在理论上是荒谬的,在实践中是有害的。兹详述如下: Read the “People’s Justice” 1999 the twelfth period “on the retrial of civil protest in the burden of proof of proof” a somewhat different view. In my opinion, in the civil protest retrial cases, the protest authority is not responsible for the burden of proof, there is no investigation of the evidence gathering function. It is absurd in theory and harmful in practice that the anti-litigation organ should bear the burden of proof in the civil protest retrial case. As detailed below: