论文部分内容阅读
有学者认为,“基金论文比”(期刊刊载的基金论文篇数在期刊发表论文总篇数中所占的比例)比“影响因子”更能代表期刊的学术质量~([1])。许多数据库也将基金论文比作为评价期刊影响力的重要指标,比如中文核心期刊(《中文核心期刊要目总览》)、中国科技核心期刊(中国科技论文统计源期刊)等的评选都采用了基金论文比这一指标。《现代中医临床》多年来始终重视对基金论文的组稿工作,但在编审修订过程中发现,有些基金论
Some scholars believe that “the ratio of fund theses” (the proportion of journal articles published in journals in the total number of papers published in journals) represents the academic quality of journals better than “influence factor” ]). Many databases also use the ratio of fund papers as an important indicator to evaluate the impact of periodicals. For example, the selection of Chinese core journals (“Chinese Core Journals”) and China Science Journals (Chinese Science Papers Source Journals) Papers than this indicator. For many years, “modern clinical Chinese medicine” has always attached great importance to the work of composing papers for fund papers. However, during the revision of the editorial review, it was found that some fund theories