论文部分内容阅读
第一部分提级执行与指定执行的现状及分析提级执行与指定执行是通过改变执行案件的管辖权从而回避执行中某些难以解决问题的一种特殊执行方式,但在实践中,由于提级执行与指定执行适用条件等的模糊,使该两项制度解决执行难题的初衷没有得到实现。在某些法院甚至还沦为滥用执行权的工具。因此,有必要对提级执行和指定执行进行规范。因重庆市高级人民法院于2004年出台并实施《关于提级执行、指定执行和共同执行的暂行办法》,在一定程度上缓解了之前辖区内法院提级执行与指定执行无法可依的局面,自其时
The first part of the executive and the designated implementation of the status quo and analysis The implementation of the designated and designated execution by changing the jurisdiction of the implementation of the case to avoid the implementation of some difficult to solve a special implementation, but in practice, due to the upgrade Implementation and implementation of the specified conditions such as the implementation of fuzzy, so that the two systems to solve the implementation of the original intention of the problem has not been achieved. In some courts even reduced to abuse of executive power tools. Therefore, it is necessary to standardize the implementation of the promotion and the designated implementation. Due to the promulgation and implementation of the Interim Measures on Promotion, Designation and Joint Implementation by Chongqing Higher People’s Court in 2004, to a certain extent, the previous implementation and designated execution by the courts in the previous jurisdiction were eased, Since then