论文部分内容阅读
谈过了《胡适全集》中的重复,就来谈它的阙失。书中重复收入同一篇文章,当然不好,它对读者的损害,是因为完全不必要地增加了篇幅,既要提高定价,又要多占书架的空间,此外倒也没有更多的坏处了。至于一部号称“全集”的书,其实不全,收文有阙失,谁如果要凭藉这“全集”来研究这位作家,就会遇到大困难。现在来说《胡适全集》。遗憾的是,《全集》不但有大量的重复,而且有大量的阙失。这阙失,有遗漏所致,也有删节所致。
Talking about the repetition in Hu Shih’s Complete Works, let’s talk about its absence. Repetition of the same article in the book, of course not good, its damage to the reader, because completely unnecessary increase in space, it is necessary to increase pricing, but also more bookshelf space, in addition, there is no more harm . As for a book called “the Complete Works,” it is actually not complete and there is no receipt for receipt. Whoever studies this writer by virtue of this “Complete Works” will encounter great difficulties. For now, “Hu Shi Complete Works.” Unfortunately, “Complete Works” not only a large number of repetitions, but also a large number of missing. This Que missing, due to omissions, but also due to abridgement.