近年间,日人学者古田武彦先生发表了题为《好太王碑的史料批判—请问共和国(北朝鲜)和中国学者》的论文。论文着重批判了把好太王碑文中出现的倭看成北九州地方海盗的观点,颇有启发。他还提出3-5世纪,在朝鲜半岛曾存在倭地的见解。对此,笔者已写出专论予以否定。古田先生在自己的论文中又进行了所谓“4-5世纪东亚东部国家关系的结构分析”,认为在以高句丽、百济、倭为一方,以新罗为另一方的国家间,在国格上存在着“格差”,前者与后者相比是当然的“上位”。这就是说,新罗和高句丽、百济相比要低一等。笔者不同意这种观点。在此,拟分三个部分陈 In recent years, a Japanese scholar, Mr. Takehiko Furuta, published an essay titled “Historical Criticism of the Good Taiwang Monument - Will the Republic (North Korea) and Chinese Scholars?”. The essay critically criticizes the view of Japanese pirates appearing in the Taiyou inscriptions as local pirates in Kitakyushu. He also raised the view that in the 3-5th century there existed the Japanese land in the Korean peninsula. In this regard, I have written a monopoly to be rejected. In his essay, Mr. Furuta carried out the so-called “structural analysis of the relations among East Asian countries in the 4-5th century.” He held that in countries with the Goguryeo, Baekje and Japanese sides as the other side and Silla as the other party, There is a “gap”, the former compared with the latter is of course the “host.” This means that Shilla and Koguryo, Baekje compared to lower first class. I do not agree with this view. Here, we plan to divide three parts into three parts