论文部分内容阅读
马克思在《1844年经济学——哲学手稿》中提出的“自由自觉的活动”命题,由于其与马克思关于劳动、对象化劳动、异化劳动概念的内在理论联系而引起人们的普遍关注。在以往的争论中,人们或认为这是一个科学的命题而肯定异化劳动和《手稿》的马克思主义价值,或坚持这是一个准科学、抑或非科学的命题而否认异化劳动和《手稿》在成熟马克思主义中的地位。笔者曾针对对该命题过分肯定的倾向,撰文着重分析了该命题的非科学成分,指出该命题(在《手稿》中)由于没有实现物质规定性和社会规定性的分化,致使马克思只
The proposition of “freedom and conscientious activity” put forward by Marx in Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts of 1844 arouses people's universal concern because of its intrinsic theoretical connection with Marx's concept of labor, objectified labor and alienated labor. In previous debates, people either denied alienating labor and “manuscripts” by affirming alienation labor and the Marxist value of “manuscripts” either as a scientific proposition or as a quasi-scientific or non-scientific proposition Mature Marxism in the position. The author has tended to over-affirm this proposition. The author focuses on analyzing the non-scientific components of the proposition and points out that the proposition (in “Manuscripts”) that Marx did not realize material differentiation and social regulation