论文部分内容阅读
目的:探讨无痛人流术与传统人流术的临床疗效及安全性比较。方法:选取2011年1月～2013年1月于我院进行人工流产的病例为研究对象,将自愿行无痛人流组200例作为观察组,传统人流组作200例为对照组,观察比较2组患者的手术时间、术中出血量、完全流产率、疼痛率及术后不良反应。结果:观察组手术时间较对照组短,观察组术中出血量较对照组少,经比较P均<0.05,具有统计学意义。观察组疼痛率为0,对照组疼痛率为40.85%,2组比较(P<0.05)差异有统计学意义。结论:无痛人流术临床效果明显优于传统人流术,且无痛人流术术中并发症较少,安全性较强,对受术者身心损害较低,值得临床推广。
Objective: To investigate the clinical efficacy and safety of painless abortion and traditional abortion. Methods: From January 2011 to January 2013 in our hospital for the case of induced abortion as the research object, will be voluntary painless group of 200 cases as the observation group, the traditional flow group of 200 cases as the control group, the observation and comparison 2 The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, complete abortion rate, pain rate and postoperative adverse reactions in the group of patients. Results: The operation time in the observation group was shorter than that in the control group. The bleeding volume in the observation group was less than that in the control group. The P values were all significantly lower than 0.05, with statistical significance. The pain rate was 0 in the observation group and 40.85% in the control group. There was significant difference between the two groups (P <0.05). Conclusion: The clinical effect of painless abortion is obviously better than that of traditional abortion. And painless abortion has fewer complications, more safety and less damage to the affected person, which is worthy of clinical promotion.