论文部分内容阅读
日本《史学杂志》第91编第5号(1982年5月号)专刊发表对1981年日本史学界的述评,现将有关蒙古史研究情况的报道编译如下:1981年,日本对蒙古史的研究取得了新的进展,在致力于以往曾深入探讨过的主题和史料的同时,更多的是重新考察已经论述过的主题,并且,更加重视参用北亚各民族留存的史料与汉文及俄文史料。通史方面,有护雅夫、神田信夫编的《北亚细亚史(新版)》(山川出版社),系二十五年前旧版的新版本。旧版采取“中国周边史”的体裁,把中亚、我国西藏、甚至朝鲜都包括在内,相形之下,新
Japan’s “Historical Science” No. 91 No. 5 (May 1982 issue) special issue published commentary on the Japanese historians in 1981, now compiled on the Mongolian history research reports are as follows: 1981, Japan’s study of the history of Mongolia New progress has been made. While devoting itself to the topics and historical materials that have been thoroughly explored in the past, the two sides have reexamined the topics that have already been discussed and attached even more importance to using the historical materials and the Chinese and Russian languages retained by the various ethnic groups in North Asia Historical materials. In the general history, there is “North Asia Minority History (new edition)” (Shanchuan Publishing House) edited by Hirohiko and Kanda Nobuo, a new version older than 25 years ago. The old version adopts the genre “History of China’s Periphery”, including Central Asia, China’s Tibet and even North Korea. In contrast, the new