论文部分内容阅读
本刊今年第5期刊登陈竺勤先生《从“至正十一年”铭元青花谈起》一文后,很快收到许多来自全国各地的读者和收藏爱好者的来信,质疑和探讨陈竺勤先生的观点和见解。本期我们刊发了郭宽先生的文章,同时转载《中国文物报》记者王征先生关于《中国古陶瓷学会召开元青花专题研讨会》的消息。我们惊喜地发现,我国古陶瓷研究的官方权威机构终于发言了,这对引领元青花的研究和辨伪,指导广大元青花爱好者如何收藏元青花,维护元青花研究的科学性无疑是十分有益的。我们期望广大收藏爱好者、古玩行业的“行家”和古陶瓷界的专家学者消除隔阂和偏见,携起手来,为研究和解决元青花领域的各种疑难问题共同奋斗。我刊将开辟专栏,刊载各种不同的见解和声音,展开元青花研究辨伪的广泛讨论。
This issue of the fifth issue of this year, published by Mr. Chen Zhuqin “from ” to positive eleven years “Ming Yuan blue and white talked about,” a text, soon received many letters from readers and collectors across the country, questioned and discussed Mr. Chen Zhuqin’s views and opinions. In this issue, we have published an article by Mr. Guo Kuan and at the same time, we have rebuilt the news about Mr. Wang Zheng, reporter of “China Cultural Relics Newspaper,” on the “Symposium on Yuan and Yuan Dynasties Held by China Ancient Ceramics Society”. We were pleasantly surprised to find that the official authority of China’s ancient ceramics research finally spoke, which undoubtedly is very useful to lead the research and discrimination of Yuan blue and white, and guide the broad masses of blue and white flower lovers how to collect Yuan blue and white, and to maintain the scientific research of Yuan blue and white of. We hope that the general collection of hobbyists, antiques experts and experts in the antiques industry will eliminate estrangements and prejudices and join hands to work together for the study and resolution of various difficult problems in the Yuan and Qing Dynasties. I will open a column print, published a variety of different opinions and voices, Yuan Yuan-blue to carry out extensive discussion of the pseudo-pseudo.