论文部分内容阅读
据《长江日报》报道,针对国内24家航空公司上月底在武汉续签了2001年国内航线收入联营协议、搞“价格同盟”的现象,经济学家胡鞍钢直斥为“腐败”。他说,从世界各国的经验来看,民航业属于一种典型的竞争性行业,而不是自然垄断行业,在市场经济中不能有例外,更不能搞特殊化,必须实行基于市场供求关系的航运政策。航空公司签订联营协议,互相限制降低竞争,这与农用车、家电领域曾出现过的价格同盟有所类似,在全面放开市场的大趋势下,些举可谓是民航改革中一阵“倒春寒”。胡鞍钢说,所谓腐败不一定是为个人谋私利,利用特殊地位为本集团谋利益的行为同样属于腐败。他指出,中国航运购买价格极其昂贵,据测算,因为垄断而造成民航消费者的福利损失每年在75亿到100亿元之间。他认为,实行市场定价机制势在必行,要将航行价格定价权由政府部门交还给市场主体(指企业),由政府计划定价转向企业根据市场供求关系自主定价,由政府过度干预市场价格转向规范市场,保证市场公平竞争。
According to the “Yangtze River Daily” reported that in response to the domestic 24 airlines late last month in Wuhan signed the 2001 domestic airline revenue joint venture agreement, engage in “price alliance” phenomenon, economist Hu Angang simply denounced as “corruption.” He said that from the experience of all countries in the world, the civil aviation industry belongs to a typical competitive industry rather than to a natural monopoly industry. There can be no exception in the market economy, not to mention specialization, and shipping based on market supply and demand must be implemented policy. Airline companies signed a joint venture agreement to reduce competition with each other. This is similar to the price alliance that appeared in the field of agricultural vehicles and home appliances. Under the general trend of liberalizing the market, some of them can be said to be a “downpour” in the civil aviation reform. Hu Angang said that the so-called corruption is not necessarily for self-serving personal interests, the use of special status for the interests of the Group also belong to corruption. He pointed out that the purchase price of Chinese shipping is extremely expensive and it is estimated that the welfare loss of civil aviation consumers is between 7.5 billion and 10 billion yuan a year because of the monopoly. He believes that the implementation of market pricing mechanism is imperative, the pricing power of navigation should be returned by the government departments to the market players (referring to enterprises), the government plans to shift pricing to enterprises based on market supply and demand independent pricing, the government over-intervention in the market price shift Standardize the market and ensure fair competition in the market.