马尔库塞在论异化与人类历史的时候,本质上是一个黑格尔主义者,他用爱欲来解释异化与人类历史的关系,最终陷入了社会主义的乌托邦之中,并没有为人类最终找到扬弃异化的出路。对于马克思主义者来说,否认异化的形而上学性。马克思对异化与人类历史的态度是“自我异化的扬弃同自我异化走的是一条道路”。马克思与黑格尔不同的是,马克思站在异化与共产主义的高度上,第一次从唯物主义角度来谈论异化与人类历史的关系,马克思谈的异化是现实个人劳动的异化,把共产主义看成是“人的自我异化的积极的扬弃”。 Marcuse, when it comes to alienation and human history, was essentially a Hegelianist who used eros to explain the relationship between alienation and human history and finally fell into the socialist utopia without end-result Find ways to subdue alienation. For Marxists, it denies the metaphysical nature of alienation. Marx’s attitude towards alienation and human history is that “the sublation of self-alienation and the alienation of self-alienation are a road”. Marx differs from Hegel in that Marx stands on the alienation and communism level. For the first time, he discusses the relationship between alienation and human history from the perspective of materialism. Alienation by Marx is the actual alienation of individual labor, and communism As a “positive sublation of human self-alienation.”