论文部分内容阅读
20世纪的“哲学的革命”实际上是哲学形态的改变、是思的性质的改变。无论在分析阵营抑或是在现象学阵营，把哲学与世界观划等号的作法都受到了严厉的批判。在分析哲学家看来，世界观哲学之误在于它是用伪命题表达一种伪知识，真正的哲学之思是分析活动；而在现象学家看来，世界观哲学之误在于它与自然科学思维的盲目认同，从而丢掉了哲学之思的独特性，真正的哲学之思是本源性的思。 20世纪世界观哲学的批判，是哲学在日益昌明的科学面前一种自我定位，是哲学生存权利的一种捍卫。
The “philosophical revolution” in the 20th century is actually a change in philosophical form and a change in the nature of thought. Whether in analyzing camps or in phenomenological camps, the practice of equating philosophy with the world outlook has been severely criticized. In the view of analytical philosophers, the mistake of world outlook philosophy lies in the fact that it uses pseudo-propositions to express a kind of false knowledge. The true philosophical thinking is analytical activity. To phenomenologists, the mistake of world outlook philosophy lies in its incompatibility with natural scientific thinking Of the blind identity, thus losing the uniqueness of philosophical thinking, the real philosophical thinking is the origin of thinking. The critique of worldview philosophy in the 20th century is a kind of self-orientation of philosophy in the face of ever-expanding science and is a safeguard for the right to existence of philosophy.