毛泽东同志反复强调的是“一分为二”，但他并没有把“一分为二”绝对化。对于毛泽东的论述，必须准确地完整地理解：他在这个地方讲了正面与反而、进攻与防御、无产阶级与资产阶级、……在那个地方又讲了侧面、撤退、小资产阶级、……综合起来看，不就是“一分为三”了嘛！把矛盾划分为主要矛盾与非主要矛盾，运用的是“两分法”，但他又划分为起主要作用的矛盾、起次要作用的矛盾、处于服从地位的矛盾，那就运用了“三分法”。他关于敌、友、我的划分，体现的是“三分”而不是“两分”。同样，国家、集体、个人的划分也是如此。“一分为三”、“三分法”、“立体思维”是毛泽东思想题中之义 Comrade Mao Zedong repeatedly emphasized “dividing one into two”, but he did not absolutely “divide one into two”. For Mao Tse-tung’s argument, we must accurately and completely understand that he spoke positive and negative here, offensive and defensive, the proletariat and the bourgeoisie ... and in that place they talked about the side, the retreat, the petty bourgeoisie, ... Taken together, it is not “one in three” it! The contradiction is divided into the main contradiction and the non-main contradiction, the use of the “dichotomy”, but he is divided into the main role of contradictions, plays a secondary role in contradictions in obedience, it uses the “three Points method. ” His division of enemy, friend, and mine shows “one-third” rather than “two-point.” In the same way, the same applies to the division of state, collective and individual. “Dividing one into three”, “one-third” and “three-dimensional thinking” are the meanings of Mao Zedong Thought