《套,也是一种抄袭》的杂谈(见本刊第8期)发表之后,有人赞成;也有人不赞成,认为套“即模仿、仿效、学习的意思”,因而得出“套,并不是一种抄袭”的结论。套,算不算抄袭?可以进一步研究。但是把它与模仿混为一谈恐怕不妥,如果与借鉴成功的写作经验相提并论,就更加失之准确。固然,一个新闻写作的新手,在生活中遇到认为可写的新闻事实不知怎样下笔,看看别人怎样命题,怎样写导语,怎样结尾等等,琢磨一下人家的路数,启迪自己的思维,这是自然的,也是应该的。但是真正动起笔来,就应当立足于自己的思考,让别人 Some people agree that some people are in favor of saying “sets are also plagiarism” after they published it (see Article 8 of this issue). Some people do not agree that it means “sets are not imitations, imitation and learning.” A plagiarism "conclusion. Set, counting plagiarism? Can be further studied. However, it may be inappropriate to confuse it with imitation, which is even more inaccurate if compared with the successful writing experience. Of course, a newcomer to news writing encounters the fact that journalistic facts that can be written in his life do not know how to write, how others write, how to write an end, etc., pondering the way of others, enlightening their own thinking, This is natural and it should be. But if you really start writing, you should base yourself on your thinking and let others