论文部分内容阅读
冲突法规则当中的法律规避行为以及产生的法律规避制度一直在存废以及是否独立于公共秩序保留制度两方面存在争议。笔者认为从起因、保护对象、性质、后果等多方面来看应从属于公共秩序保留制度。在存废问题上,由于法律规避行为中规避意图认定在法律价值、司法实践等方面都存在问题,以及法律规避制度可能有损法律权威,结合法律规避制度立法现状和发展潮流,对于法律规避制度笔者认为应当借鉴英美法系国家的做法,在立法上慎重对待法律规避制度,将其改进并纳入到公共秩序保留制度当中去。
The law avoidance act in conflict of laws rules and the legal avoidance system that have been produced have been in dispute for a long time and are independent of the system of reservation of public order. I believe that from the cause, the object of protection, nature, consequences and other aspects should belong to the public order system. On the issue of exiting and abolishing, due to the avoidance of intent in legal evasion behavior, there are problems in legal value, judicial practice and other aspects, as well as legal evasion system may undermine the legal authority. Combining with legal present situation and development trend, I think we should draw lessons from Anglo-American legal system practice, take the legislative treatment of legal avoidance system, to improve and incorporate it into the system of public order.