2013年,德国宪法学又有了一些变动和发展,联邦宪法法院一如既往做出了诸多重要判决,学界也出现了许多讨论。例如,重要公法期刊《国家》(Der Staat)在2013年先是刊载了宪法大家阿列克西(Robert Alexy)教授对于另一位大家易普生(J(o|¨)rn Ipsen)教授基本权理论的评论,阿列克西教授在文中逐一梳理了易普生对于基本权利教义学通说的四点不同意见;~①之后易普生教授又撰文回应了阿列克西教授的批评。②从这一轮笔战, In 2013, there were some changes and developments in the German constitutional law. The Federal Constitutional Court, as always, has made many important judgments and many discussions have taken place in academia. For example, Der Staat, an important public law journal, first published in 2013 the constitutional authority of Professor Robert Alexy on the other, Professor J (o | ¨) rn Ipsen) In his comments on the theory, Professor Alexei sorted out one by one the four different views of Epson on the doctrine of fundamental rights; and after that, Professor Ipsen responded to Professor Aleksi’s criticism. ② From this round of combat,