论文部分内容阅读
目的探讨并比较腹腔镜与开腹全子宫切除术的临床效果。方法 48例全子宫切除术患者,随机分为观察组和对照组,各24例。观察组采用腹腔镜治疗,对照组采用开腹治疗,对比两组患者的临床治疗效果。结果两组患者手术时间比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);观察组出血量(96.1±10.9)ml、住院时间(4.5±1.4)d以及并发症发生率4.17%(1/24)均显著少于对照组,两组相比差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论腹腔镜全子宫切除术具有较好的临床疗效,手术中出血量较少,治疗周期短,而且术后并发症发生率比较低,值得临床应用推广。
Objective To investigate and compare the clinical effects of laparoscopic and open hysterectomy. Methods 48 cases of hysterectomy patients were randomly divided into observation group and control group, 24 cases each. The observation group was treated by laparoscopy and the control group by laparotomy. The clinical effects of the two groups were compared. Results There was no significant difference in operative time between the two groups (P> 0.05). Bleeding volume (96.1 ± 10.9) ml, hospitalization time (4.5 ± 1.4) days and complication rate were 4.17% (1/24) in the observation group Significantly less than the control group, the difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P <0.05). Conclusion Laparoscopic hysterectomy has good clinical efficacy, less bleeding during surgery, short treatment period, and the incidence of postoperative complications is relatively low, it is worth promoting the clinical application.