冯友兰吸收西方现代哲学的逻辑分析方法改造中国哲学,在谋求传统哲学现代化方面进行了一次大胆的尝试。就哲学方法而言,冯先生至少在以下两点上区别于以逻辑分析见长的维也纳学派、新实在论等西方现代实证主义哲学:一是,他不赞同维也纳学派否认概念的客观意义,把逻辑分析单纯限定在语言逻辑的范围,并由此出发取消形而上学的作法,主张由“辨名”(分析语言概念)而“析理”(认识客观实在),运用逻辑分析方法重建形而上学;二是,他认为逻辑分析并不是唯一有效的哲学方法,主张理智与直觉互补,认为在运用逻辑分析方法讲形而上学的同时,还必须求助于“负的方法”,即直觉方法。一、“讲形上学不能讲”冯友兰说:“真正底形上学的方法有两种:一 Feng Youlan absorbs the logical analysis of Western modern philosophy to transform Chinese philosophy and makes a bold attempt to modernize traditional philosophy. In terms of philosophical methods, Feng differs from the modern western positivist philosophy such as the Vienna School and the Neo-Realism, which are distinguished by logical analysis, at least in the following two aspects: First, he disagrees with the Vienna School’s denial of the objective meaning of concepts and the logic The analysis simply limits the scope of linguistic logic and starts from the metaphysics. It advocates that “metaphysics” (knowing objective reality) be resolved by “distinguishing” (analytic language concept) and metaphysics is reconstructed by logic analysis. Second, He believes that logical analysis is not the only effective philosophical method. He advocates that intellect and intuition complement each other. He believes that while applying logical analytic metaphysics, he must resort to the “negative method,” that is, the intuitive method. First, “can not talk about the school of speech,” Feng Youlan said: "There are two real ways to go to school: one