论文部分内容阅读
目的:探讨腹腔镜与传统手术对胃癌根治术的临床疗效。方法:选取2013年7月~2014年10月32例于我院治疗的胃癌患者,根据入院顺序随机地将他们分为观察组16例和对照组为16例。两组的年龄、性别、肿瘤大小、位置无明显的差异。观察组采用腹腔镜胃癌根治术,对照组则采用传统的开腹胃癌根治术。分析比较两组患者在术中及术后的恢复情况,以及两种术式对胃癌治疗的疗效。结果:观察组的出血量、下床时间及肛门排气时间均明显少于对照组的时间,观察组的NR明显少于对照组,且差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:研究表明行腹腔镜胃癌根治术在术后恢复较好,具有明显的优势,且治疗效果与传统开腹术相当,值得推广。
Objective: To investigate the clinical effect of laparoscopy and traditional surgery on radical gastrectomy. Methods: Twenty-three gastric cancer patients treated in our hospital from July 2013 to October 2014 were randomly divided into observation group (16 cases) and control group (16 cases). Two groups of age, gender, tumor size, location no significant difference. The observation group was treated with laparoscopic radical gastrectomy and the control group with the conventional open radical gastrectomy. Analysis of two groups of patients during and after surgery recovery, and two kinds of surgical treatment of gastric cancer efficacy. Results: The amount of bleeding, time to bed and anus exhaust time in the observation group were significantly less than those in the control group. NR in the observation group was significantly less than that in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P <0.05). Conclusion: The study shows that laparoscopic radical gastrectomy in postoperative recovery better, with obvious advantages, and the treatment effect is equivalent to the traditional open surgery, it is worth promoting.