论文部分内容阅读
本文以研究法院调解不同阶段中,法官行为的特征及功能为进路,分析法官在不同阶段中权力的不同属性,并以此为指导对法院调解制度改革提出几点建议。在这两个阶段中,法官的调解行为具有不同的功能和特点,法律效力截然不同,而其根源则在于两阶段法官权力的不同,后者具有裁判权的强制性本质。法院调解制度的构建亦应注意并体现出法官权力的这种阶段性区分,因此,笔者建议扩大诉前调解的范围,建立具有开放性的诉讼调解制度,使调解在程序、案件、当事人范围各方面均能突破现有规范内容,充分发挥调解灵活性的优势,并完善对违法调解的程序救济及纠正措施。
This paper takes the study of the characteristics and functions of judges ’behavior in different stages of court mediation as an approach, analyzes the different attributes of judges’ power in different stages and gives some suggestions on the reform of court mediation system. Judicial mediation has different functions and characteristics in these two stages. The legal effect is quite different. The root of the judge’s mediation lies in the difference of two-stage judge’s power, which has the mandatory nature of the jurisdiction. Therefore, the author proposes to expand the scope of pre-trial mediation and establish an open system of mediation in litigation, so that the scope of mediation in the process, the parties, the scope of the parties All aspects can break through existing normative content, give full play to the advantages of flexibility in mediation, and improve remedies and corrective measures for violations of mediation.