论文部分内容阅读
马克思在其思想发展历程中曾提出过多种关于“人的本质”的理论,其中以《1844年经济学哲学手稿》中的“劳动类本质论”和《关于费尔巴哈提纲》中的“社会关系总和论”较为成熟。学界一般认为时间在后的“社会关系总和论”才是马克思关于人的本质理论的完备表述,而此前的“劳动类本质论”是被抛弃的错误思想。但从马克思关于人的本质的几种理论的历史关系和逻辑关系来看,以上两种理论不但不冲突,而且同是马克思关于人的本质理论的重要组成部分,只有在两者的相互诠释中才能全面理解马克思关于人的本质的理论。
In the course of his thought development, Marx put forward many kinds of theories about “the nature of human being”. Among them, the theory of “labor essence” in “Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts of 1844” and “ Outline ”in the“ sum of social relations ”is more mature. It is generally accepted by academics that the “theory of the sum of social relations” after the time is the complete formulation of Marx’s theory of human nature, whereas the previous “theory of the essence of labor” is the wrong thought that has been abandoned. However, from the historical and logical relations of several theories about human nature of Marx, the above two theories not only do not conflict, but also are an important part of Marx’s theory of human nature. Only in the mutual interpretation of the two Can we fully understand Marx’s theory of human nature.