论文部分内容阅读
2015年1月6日,最高人民法院发布了《关于审理环境民事公益诉讼案件适用法律若干问题的解释》。这意味着我国《民事诉讼法》和《环境保护法》确立的公益诉讼制度走出了“纸面法”的尴尬困境,迈向了制度构建的具体化和制度运行的实践化,必将为惩治打击环境侵权行为、促进环境治理和生态保护,以及推动环境侵权公益诉讼成为新常态起到积极作用。但是,由于我国环境侵权公益诉讼包括私益诉讼都处于起步阶段,迫切需要了解、研习国外环境侵权诉讼的运作方式、样态及其效果,从而审视、检讨我国的司法实践。而案例研究是找到
On January 6, 2015, the Supreme People’s Court promulgated the Interpretations on Several Issues Concerning the Application of Law in the Trial of Cases of Environmental Public Interest Litigation. This means that the system of public interest litigation established by China’s “Civil Procedure Law” and “Environmental Protection Law” has gone beyond the awkward predicament of “Paper Law ” and has embarked on the concreteness of system construction and the practicalization of institutional operation. It plays a positive role in punishing the fight against environmental infringement, promoting environmental governance and ecological protection, and promoting environmental rights infringement public interest litigation to become the new normal. However, since China’s environmental public interest litigation, including private litigation, is in its infancy, there is an urgent need to understand and study the operation mode, modality and effect of foreign environmental tort litigation so as to examine and review our judicial practice. Case studies are found