论文部分内容阅读
从“评常用抗生素的应用常识”与“对陈诚献同志所提意见的答复”一文看来,二者都有一定的理论根据。陈、戴二位在有关抗生素剂量、相尅……等问题上,存在着分歧意见;但目前有关抗生素应用方面的意见,如剂量、相尅……等问题,至今国内外学者争论尚多,还不能获得一致的结论,这些问题确实有待医界今后进一步的研究。另外二篇文章中有许多论点如:抗生素治疗回归热,应只限于重笃病人、黄疸、肾功能损伤及对砷剂敏感的病人;抗生素对大肠菌感染的治疗,一般临床经验青霉素大多无效,链霉素易产生抗药性;青霉素对许多葡萄球菌感染是无效的,磺胺剂在这方面是优于青霉素的,等等,则已为国内外多数学者所承认。我们认为这二篇文章对广大读者的实际工作有很大参考价值,故在此一并发表,以供读者参考。
From the “common sense of application of commonly used antibiotics” and “Reply to the comments made by Comrade Chen Chengxian” article seems, both have a certain theoretical basis. There are differences of opinion on the issues such as dosage of antibiotics, phase-g, and so on. However, the current opinions on the application of antibiotics, such as dosage, phase g and so on, have so far been disputed by scholars both at home and abroad. The same conclusions can not be obtained yet. These problems really need further study by the medical community in the future. There are many other articles in the other two articles such as: antibiotic treatment of regression heat should be limited to patients with severe Duchenne, jaundice, renal dysfunction and arsenic-sensitive patients; antibiotics for the treatment of coliform infection, the general clinical experience most of penicillin is invalid, Streptomycin susceptible to drug resistance; penicillin is not effective for many staphylococcal infections, sulfa drugs in this respect is better than penicillin, and so on, it has been recognized by most scholars at home and abroad. We think these two articles have a great reference value for the actual work of readers. Therefore, they are published here for readers’ reference.