论文部分内容阅读
涉嫌非法索取、收受贿赂款451万元,乌鲁木齐铁路运输中级法院(以下简称乌铁中院)院长坐上了被告席。此案引起了社会各界广泛关注,引起了法律界的一场大纷争,个中是非曲直引发的争议不绝于耳,人们对此“现象”的关注已经远远地超越了案件本身,因为它向人们提出了一个严肃的社会命题,我们将如何解读这些“新”的语汇?如何树立人民群众对司法公正的信心?司法机关享有豁免权是国际惯例吗?法院万一被判有罪,法院会不会被解散?法院涉嫌犯罪被依法审判,如何防司法单位的犯罪?
Suspected of obtaining and accepting bribes amounted to 4.51 million yuan, Urumqi Intermediate People’s Court of Railway Transportation (hereinafter referred to as the Uruguayan Intermediate People’s Court) sat on the dock. The case has aroused widespread concern in the community and has caused a major dispute among the legal community. The controversy that has arisen over and over in this series of disputes has never ceased to exist. The concern of people over this phenomenon has far exceeded that of the case itself, People put forward a serious social proposition, how will we interpret these “new ” vocabulary? How to establish people’s confidence in the fairness of justice? Is it an international practice for the judiciary to enjoy immunity? If the court is found guilty, the court Will the court be dismissed? Court suspected of crime is judged according to law, how to prevent the crime of judicial units?