论文部分内容阅读
目的对山东省血液中心2009～2011年机采献血者队伍状况进行分析,为机采献血者招募与保留提供指导与参考。方法用唐山计算机软件统计模块和EXCEL表格汇总统计机采献血者资料,用SPSS17.0进行数据分析,构成比的比较采用卡方检验。结果 2009～2011年共有机采献血者3 481人。与上1年相比,2010年新加入献血者716人,保留908人,2011年新入545人,保留819人;献血者男女性别比为3∶1;献血者的出生年份主要分布在1984～1991年;学生在献血者职业分布中所占比例最高为29.33%,国家工作人员及专业技术人员所占比例只有15.83%;大学专科及以上学历献血者是献血的主要人群,占总数的50.68%;RhD(+)献血者中A型献血者与B、O型献血者相比分别减少15.03%、14.80%;献血者每年多次(≥3次)捐献机采成分血的比例逐年升高,分别占当年献血人数的31.75%、46.06%、55.94%,各年间比较有统计学意义(P<0.05);献血者单次捐献双份成分血的比例逐年升高,各年所占比例分别为52.96%、61.20%和72.33%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论今后应加大新入献血者、男性献血者、A型献血者和国家工作人员及专业技术人员的招募,巩固与保留现有献血者,控制单次捐献双份成分血的比例。
Objective To analyze the status of blood donors collected from blood collection centers in Shandong Province from 2009 to 2011, and provide guidance and reference for the recruitment and retention of blood donors. Methods Tangshan computer software statistical module and EXCEL form summary statistics collected blood donor data, SPSS17.0 for data analysis, the composition ratio of the use of chi-square test. Results A total of 3 481 blood donors were collected from 2009 to 2011. Compared with the previous year, 716 new blood donors were recruited in 2010, 908 were reserved, 545 were new recruits in 2011, 819 were retained; the male-to-female sex ratio of blood donors was 3: 1; the years of birth of blood donors were mainly distributed in 1984 ~ In 1991, students accounted for the highest percentage of blood donors occupational distribution of 29.33%, national staff and professional and technical personnel accounted for only 15.83%; college and above blood donors are major blood donors, accounting for 50.68% ; Blood donors in RhD (+) donors were 15.03% and 14.80% less than those in blood donors in type B and O, respectively; the proportion of donor blood donations was increased year by year (more than or equal to 3 times) Respectively, accounting for 31.75%, 46.06%, 55.94% of the number of blood donors in that year, with statistical significance in each year (P <0.05). The proportion of donated single blood donors increased year by year, the proportions in each year were 52.96%, 61.20% and 72.33% respectively, the difference was statistically significant (P <0.05). Conclusion In the future, new blood donors, male blood donors, type A blood donors and national staff and professional and technical personnel should be recruited to consolidate and retain existing blood donors and control the proportion of single donation of double component blood.