全球化语境下中国文学理论存在内外双重危机,从本土文论效用和发展创新看,危机主要表现为“失效”和创新不足两个大的方面,同时还伴随着精神的“失重”和建构的“失范”。失效指的是对文论功能的期望与现实不符所导致的失望,同时也不排除保守的立场和对传统文论的眷恋情结。创新不足集中地表现为理论原创的缺失,导致中国文论处于“复语”状态从而有着成为西方文论附庸的理论安全危机。从中国文论在世界范围内的传播来说,存在对话的缺失及话语权力的不对等、不平衡等问题,有被同化和被边缘化的危机。别现代主义以其语界的坚守防止外来理论话语的同化;以中国问题为研究出发点,防止理论与实际的脱节;坚持理论的开放和对话,防止理论的封闭、固守和专制,也警惕理论的泛化和滥用。显然,别现代主义的理论主张可以作为应对文论危机的一种策略选择。 In the context of globalization, Chinese literary theory has both internal and external double crises. From the perspective of local literary theory and development and innovation, the crisis is mainly manifested in two major aspects: “failure” and “lack of innovation”, accompanied by spiritual “weightlessness ”And construct “ norm ”. Failure refers to the disappointment caused by the inconsistency between the expectation and the reality of the function of literary theory, and it also does not exclude the conservative standpoint and attachment to traditional literary theory. The lack of innovation focused on the lack of theoretical originality, which led to the fact that Chinese literary criticism is in a “complex language” state and thus has a theoretical security crisis that has become a vassal of western literary theory. From the perspective of the spread of Chinese literary theory in the world, there are such problems as the lack of dialogue and the unequal and unbalanced discourse power, the crisis of assimilation and marginalization. Do not modernism adhere to its linguistic boundaries to prevent the assimilation of foreign theory discourse; to take China as a starting point to study the issue, to prevent the theory and the reality of the separation; adhere to the theory of open and dialogue, to prevent the theory of closed, stick and autocracy, but also vigilance theory Generalization and abuse. Obviously, the theory of modernism can be used as a tactic to deal with the crisis of literary theory.