曾经写过一篇《奇谈怪论》,颇不以黄苇町用彭德怀在大饥饿年代为民请命来证明中国共产党始终代表人民利益这种论辩手法为然。事情很浅显,彭德怀因此被判为“反党”而不是代表党,哪能为了理论的需要把“反党”与党划个等号呢?又读了一篇文章,发现这种论辩法并非黄苇町个人所独有 He once wrote an article entitled “Strange Talk,” rather than using the argumentative method by which Peng Wei of the People’s Republic of China was defeated by Peng Wei in the era of great hunger to prove that the Chinese Communist Party always represented the interests of the people. It is obvious that Peng Dehuai was therefore sentenced as “anti-party” rather than representative and how can we equate “anti-party” with the party for the sake of his theory? After reading another article, he found that this argument is not yellow Reed-cho individual unique