论文部分内容阅读
[案情]李某,男,26岁,某机关服务中心机械加工部临时工。2012年11月6日20时许,李某在某住宅楼一单元楼下将王某的摩托车(价值35000元)的车锁锯开,推至自己的机械加工部,用铁锤将该车的左侧大板、转向灯、前仪表盘等砸坏,损坏物品价值11800元,后将摩托车放置在楼群中。被查获后,赃物被起获发还事主。李某对上述事实没有提出异议,但表示其是为了报复而毁坏事主的摩托车,主观上没有非法占有的故意。本案处理过程中,对于李某的行为性质如何认定,产生了两种不同意见。第一种意见认为,李某的行为应认定故意毁坏财物罪。理由是:故意毁坏财物罪在客观方面可以表现为秘密毁坏,由于行为人为了逃避打击,毁坏公私财物的行为往往可能秘密进行,而且行为人还会根据作案环境或者财物的物质状态等情况,决定是就地毁坏,还是移动至其他地方进行毁坏。如果行为
[Case] Lee, male, 26 years old, a service center mechanical processing department temporary workers. November 6, 2012 20 am, Lee downstairs in a residential building a unit of Wang’s motorcycle (worth 35,000 yuan) lock sawed, pushed to their own mechanical processing department, with a hammer to the The left side of the car plate, turn signals, dash before the dashboard, damage the value of 11,800 yuan, after the motorcycle placed in the building group. After being seized, the stolen goods were repurchased by the victim. Lee did not challenge the above facts, but said it was to retaliate and destroy the victim’s motorcycle, the subjective no intention of possession. In the process of handling the case, there are two different opinions on how to identify the nature of Lee’s behavior. The first opinion that Lee’s behavior should be found intentional destruction of property crimes. The reason is that the crime of intentional destruction of property can be manifested as a secret destruction objectively. Since the perpetrator may evade blows, the destruction of public and private property may or may not be confidential, and the perpetrator may decide according to the material conditions of the crime environment or property Destroyed on the spot or moved to other places for destruction. If you act