论文部分内容阅读
思想史的研究是注重训诂之学,强调历史的“真实”性,以达到恢复历史本来面貌的目的;还是注重哲理性的反思,强调观念的系统性,以达到义理的推陈出新?这个“史”与“思”的问题历来争论不断。上世纪90年代在香港《二十一世纪》上引发的何炳棣与新儒家关于“克己复礼”真诠的一场大争论,正是这一争议的典型表现。虽然他们各说各话,少有交集,终让这场论战无果而终,但观战者中也有学者提出一些新的思维,有助于我们对思想史的“史”与“思”问题做进一步的思考。
The study of ideological history pays attention to the study of exegesis and emphasizes the “real ” nature of history in order to achieve the purpose of restoring the original appearance of history. Or is it focusing on philosophical introspection and emphasizing the systematicness of concepts in order to achieve the innovation of ethics? The problems of “history” and “thinking” have been constantly debated. He Bingdi and the Neo-Confucian debates over the true interpretation of “self-denial” in Hong Kong’s “21st Century” in the 1990s were the typical examples of this controversy. Although they talked and talked so little that they eventually ended the debate without success, some scholars in the warriors also put forward some new thinking and helped us to think more about the “history” and “thinking” of the history of ideas "Issue to do further thinking.