朱熹与王阳明分别站在理学与心学的立场上,对《大学》“格物致知”做出了不同的诠释。熊十力在对这两种诠释进行了深入比较之后,提出了自己对“格物致知”的独特理解。在对“致知”的诠释上,熊先生采取王阳明之说;而在对“格物”的诠释上,却赞成朱熹。但他同时认为,致知是体,格物是用,承体起用,即用显体,致良知必落实于格物穷理,而格物穷理必归结于致良知,两者皆不可偏废,从而在某种程度上实现了“格物穷理”与“致良知”之间的双向贯通,并进而提出了自己对《大学》“格物致知”的新诠释。 Zhu Xi and Wang Yangming stand on the standpoint of Neo-Confucianism and psychology respectively and make different interpretations of “university” and “gezhizhizhi”. Xiong Shi Li in-depth comparison of these two interpretations, put forward his own unique understanding of In his interpretation of “To Know ”, Mr. Xiong adopted Wang Yangming’s remark; while on the interpretation of “Lattice ”, he favored Zhu Xi. However, at the same time, he also believes that knowing is the body, the things are used, the objects are used, that is, they are used to show their conscience, and the conscience leads to the poor things, while the things are inevitably attributed to the conscience, both of which can not be neglected. It realizes the two-way intercommunication between “poorer” and “conscience”, and then puts forward his own new interpretation of “university” and “knowledge of the matter”.