论文部分内容阅读
本文试图从一个新的视角即依于《说文》而不囿于《说文》,本于小篆而不泥于小篆,通过一些新的古文字材料与小篆书写系统比对来揭示“类”与“首”形成和定型的年代、考察古文字的“类”与“首”的发展脉络;通过一些新的语言学理论如词汇扩散理论、语义场理论以及范畴理论来解释和分析“类”与“首”的形成机制和过程。即通过比对甲骨文、金文、战国文字与小篆,追寻它们的历史演变轨迹,探讨“建类一首”的发展形成和确定过程,分析“建类一首”的两种不同模式,探讨“建类一首”对汉字体系形成的重要意义。
This article tries to reveal from a new perspective that is based on “Shuo Wen” rather than “Shuo Wen” and on Xiao Zhuan rather than Zhuan Xiao Zhuan, through the comparison of some new ancient writing materials with Xiaowen writing system, “And” the first “form and stereotypes of the era, the study of ancient characters ” class “and ” first “development context; through a number of new linguistic theories such as vocabulary diffusion theory, semantic field theory and category theory Explain and analyze the formation mechanism and process of ”class“ and ”first“. By comparing the Oracle, Jin Wen, the Warring States period characters and Xiaozhuan, we can trace their historical evolution and explore the formation and determination process of ”building a class “, and analyze the two different types of ”building a class “ Mode, to explore ”building a class " on the formation of the Chinese character system significance.