马克思主义与后现代主义是一个颇令人费解且充满疑难的题域。詹姆逊曾有些无奈地说,将两者联系在一起的尝试或努力,往往会被人们视之为一种缺少稳固基础且充满悖论的奇异结合,往往呈现出将苏维埃革命时期泛黄的老照片与缤纷霓虹的豪华大酒店并置在一起所产生的奇异景观和怪诞效果。确实,在许多人的观念里,一个后现代主义者,无论从何种意义上说都不可能是一个马克思主义者,似乎马克思主义与后现代主义从来都是南辕北辙、风马牛不相及的两件事情。在理解马克思主义与后现代主义的问题上主要存在着两种观点。一种观点认为,后现代主义文化思潮的勃兴,不仅意味着马克思主义已经过时,甚至宣告了马克思主义的终结。在后工业时代或晚期资本主义时代,当代社会的政治、经济、文化及日常生活都已发生了根本性的变化,马克思主义已经丧失了解释当下现实的有效性。另一种观点认为,后现代主义作为当代社会生活日益时尚化、碎片化、平面化的文化表征,是一种具有相对主义和虚无主义色彩的思想模式,是一种拒斥深度、反对崇高的语言文化游戏。因此,后现代主义与具有崇高革命理想、追求人类自由解放的马克思主义之间,不仅没有任何共同之处,甚至是相互对立、水火不容的两种思想体系。虽然, Marxism and post-modernism are quite puzzling and problematic subjects. Jameson once said with some helplessness that attempting or trying to tie the two together was often regarded by people as a singular combination of lacking a solid foundation and full of paradoxes, often showing the yellowing of the Soviet revolution Old photos and colorful neon luxury hotel together created by the bizarre landscape and weird effects. Indeed, in many people’s sense, a postmodernist can not be a Marxist in any sense. It seems that Marxism and postmodernism have always been totally different from other political systems. Two things. There are mainly two kinds of views on understanding Marxism and post-modernism. One view holds that the rise of the postmodernist cultural trend of thought not only means that Marxism is outdated and even proclaimed the end of Marxism. In the post-industrial era or the late capitalist era, the political, economic, cultural and daily life of contemporary society have undergone fundamental changes. Marxism has lost the usefulness of explaining the present reality. Another view is that postmodernism, as an increasingly fashionable, fragmented and planar cultural representation of contemporary social life, is a relativistic and nihilistic ideological model that is both a rejection of depth and a rejection of loftiness Language and Culture Games. Therefore, there is not only no common ground between postmodernism and Marxism with lofty revolutionary ideal and the pursuit of human freedom and liberation, but also two kinds of ideological systems that are mutually antagonistic and perplexed. although,