论文部分内容阅读
康德在《纯粹理性批判》第一版中分析了“第二谬误推理”的谬误之处:(1)“我思是单纯的”这一命题,只在把“我思”理解为主观统觉的统一性的时候,该命题才是有效的。相反,如果把“我思”看作是实体的单纯性,则是无效的。(2)关于这一命题是如何产生的,分为两种情况:在把我思看作是主观先验统觉的时候,它是分析命题;而如果把我思看作是实体的时候,则是一个虚假的先天综合命题,因此,它只不过是建立在先验幻相基础上的谬误推理。
Kant, in the first edition of Critique of Pure Reason, analyzed the fallacies of “second fallacious reasoning”: (1) The proposition that “I think is simple” This proposition is valid when it comes to the unity of subjective perception. On the contrary, if we consider “I think” as the simpleness of the entity, it is ineffective. (2) As to how this proposition is produced, there are two kinds of situations: when thinking of me as a subjective transcendental perspective, it is an analytical proposition; and if I think of it as an entity, It is a false congenital synthesis proposition, therefore, it is only based on a priori illusion of false reasoning.