论文部分内容阅读
将1988年9月～1989年5月间在美国佛罗里达Tampa 总医院的248例剖宫产病人随机分成两组。一组关腹时缝合腹膜,另一组关腹时不缝合腹膜。所有病例的手术皮肤切口均采用 Pfannenstiel 切口,常规切开腹壁各层入腹腔,子宫切口依术中情况分为下段横切口或者纵切口或者宫体纵切口。缝合腹膜时,缝合组用3-0的复合缝线连续缝合腹膜,而不缝合组则不缝合腹膜。住院期间每天进行检查,术后6周再进行评估,所得结果经统计学处
Between September 1988 and May 1989, 248 patients with caesarean section in Tampa General Hospital in Florida were randomly divided into two groups. A group of abdominal closure of the peritoneum, the other group did not close the abdominal peritoneal suture. All cases of surgical skin incision were made using Pfannenstiel incision, abdominal incision routine abdominal incision, uterine incision according to the situation is divided into the lower transverse incision or longitudinal incision or longitudinal incision. When the peritoneum was sutured, the peritoneum was continuously sutured with a 3-0 composite suture, while the peritoneum was not sutured without the suture group. During the hospitalization every day for examination, 6 weeks after the re-assessment, the results obtained by the Statistics Department