论文部分内容阅读
司马迁的《史记》是不朽的历史巨著。张骞,自然也是一个值得表彰的有过伟大历史功绩的人物,但司马迁在《史记·大宛列传》中宣称的“张骞凿空”,认为在张骞通西域以后,“西北国始通于汉”,实在是一个很不准确的结论。两千年来,这个历史结论影响甚广。在“丝绸之路”脍炙人口的今天,仍有不少同志在重复宣传这个故事,宣扬张骞使西域才开通了“丝绸之路”。贵刊在第8期发表的《开拓“丝绸之路”的人》一文,也是这样的观点。这实在是一个历史的误会,也确实是一个应该予以澄清的观点,目前已有不少考古资料可以帮助说明这个问题了。许多考古资料说明,“丝绸之路”早在汉代以
Sima Qian’s “Historical Records” is a monumental historical monograph. Zhang Qian is naturally worthy of recognition as well. However, Sima Qian proclaimed “Zhang Qian hollowing out” in the “Historical Biography of Daowan Biography,” saying that after “opening up the Western Regions by Zhang Qian” , It is a very inaccurate conclusion. For two thousand years, this historical conclusion has a great influence. Today, as the “Silk Road” enjoys popular popularity, many comrades continue to publicize this story and proclaim that Zhang Qian made the opening of the “Silk Road” in the Western Regions. The same is true of the “man who opens up the Silk Road” published by your magazine in Issue 8. This is really a historical misunderstanding. It is indeed a point that should be clarified. At present, there are many archeological materials that can help illustrate this issue. Many archeological data show that “Silk Road” as early as the Han Dynasty