论文部分内容阅读
比较全球金融危机冲击下中美两种模式的不同反应,我们发现中国模式的本质是干部行政逻辑主导市场资本逻辑下两重逻辑的融合生长。社会化和工业化都不是市场资本逻辑可以单独完成的任务,因此形成了干部行政逻辑的现实基础。两重逻辑分界线大致经过了一个先上移、再下沉的运动,中国模式也相应经历了两重逻辑的承包结合、宏观调控和融合生长三个时期。目前中国模式处于以干部行政逻辑相对强化为内容的两重逻辑融合生长、逐渐成熟的历史阶段。
When we compare the different responses of China and the United States under the impact of the global financial crisis, we find that the essence of the Chinese model is the integration and growth of the dual logic under the logic of market-oriented leadership by the cadre’s administrative logic. Socialization and industrialization are not tasks that the market capital logic can accomplish alone, thus forming the realistic basis for the administrative logic of cadres. The logic boundary between the two branches went through a movement of moving up first and then sinking again. The Chinese model has undergone three periods of contracting and combining of dual logic, macro-control and integration and growth. At present, the Chinese model is at a historical stage of dual logic of growth and gradual maturity with the relative reinforcement of the administrative logic of cadres.