论文部分内容阅读
上海老西门邮局没收一张百元假币,当事人不服,一纸诉状把银行告到法院,引发了一场国内首例不服没收假币行政诉讼案。又因为被告是很少与人打官司的中国人民银行,此案引起了司法界、金融界的特别关注。被没收“假币”时包律师不吵不闹1999年6月7日,上海浦东新区法院开庭审理该案,原告上海金钟律师事务所青年律师包更生诉称:1999年4月28日,他从某国有大型企业领取了现金,便到老西门邮电所级付当月的移动电话费,递给当班营业员童志伟5张百元面额的人民币。童志伟收款后,称其中有一张是假币,并拒绝原告复看一下的要求,转身进入里间,在离开原告视线的情
Shanghai Laoximen door confiscated a hundred dollars counterfeit currency, the parties refused to accept a paper sued the bank to court, triggering a domestic first case of confiscation of counterfeit cash administrative litigation. And since the defendants are the People’s Bank of China, which seldom deal with people, the case has drawn special attention from the judicial and financial circles. Was confiscated “counterfeit money ” lawyer when the package is not noisy No June 17, 1999, the Shanghai Pudong New District court hearing the case, the plaintiff Advocate Young Advocate package lawyer said: April 28, 1999 , He received cash from a large state-owned enterprises, they went to the old West Gate post office to pay mobile phone charges that month, handed sales agent Tong Zhiwei five hundred yuan denomination of RMB. Tong Zhiwei collection, said one of them is a counterfeit currency, and refused to review the plaintiff’s request, turned inside, leaving the plaintiff’s attention