绝对虚假,相对真实

来源 :英语学习 | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:ccqccqccq
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
  At the age of ten I read a sci-fi novel about robots. In it, the protagonist1 was a happy, normal wife and mother of three until one day she discovered a journal in the attic of her house. At first, she thought it was a journal she wrote a long time ago but forgot about, as it talks about the things that happened in her life. But as she reads more and more into it, she realizes that she is not a person—she is a robot, built as a replacement for the original woman who died of cancer at a young age. There was a memory stick installed in her mechanical brain, and her body simulated2 that of a normal human. She was only a high-tech tool to comfort the woman’s kids, a way to hide the fact that their mother died before they could remember. Her parts lay in a small box in the corner of a factory until the husband bought and assembled them and gave her a “past”. This fact shattered3 her heart. She was not who she thought she was, she was not “herself”, and she didn’t even have a self. As a child, I cried my eyes out for her misfortune.
  I was so in love with the book that I sat down with my parents and asked them a serious question: Am I a robot that you bought to replace your dead daughter? They started laughing and it became one of my most well-known childhood anecdotes4, but at the same time I would never know the true answer to this question. In fact, I wouldn’t ever know if the whole world around me was just a scene in a movie and everyone was a robot designed to play along.5 Even I could be a robot designed to question myself and think critically. The ultimate question would be, how can I know who I really am?
  Whatever answers we give to ourselves all go on in our brains, and are thus unreliable if we are not really humans with functioning brains. We are always trying to think “outside of the box” inside the box, so can we ever get to the level of understanding deep and subjective enough to know reality?
  Growing up I’ve always had extremely realistic dreams—the ones that make you stare blankly at the wall when you wake up, confused and startled because you can’t quite differentiate between the dream and reality just yet.6 I am usually amazed by the brain’s ability to create “experiences” so similar to what we feel in real life that it almost seems like a parallel universe. However, sometimes I do start questioning myself: How do I know that I am not living in a dream right now? Or worse, how do I know whether I am really experiencing my happiness and sorrow or if I am just a lunatic7 living in her head? I see my fingers in front of my eyes typing on the keyboard, but how do I know that my fingers are really my fingers or that I am really writing an essay about subjective reality? Of course, it will be quite terrible to suddenly wake up from a dream and realize that all of these words are not actually typed on my computer, but only existed in a dream, and that I need to write everything all over again. However, there seems to be no substantial8 way to prove that I am really writing this essay and sometime later YOU are really reading an essay written by a student all the way across the country.   Our worlds are largely built on experiences, which come from sense perceptions9. What we perceive becomes our subjective experience, which later molds into our world view. Some people may argue that things like imagination are not limited to our senses, but I would say that imagination depends on previous knowledge. For example, when we see aliens in Hollywood movies, they usually have eyes as big as a bee’s nest and a head like the shape of an upside-down triangle. They do look very peculiar, but all of the features of this creature, such as eyes and hands, come from our self-identity as humans. Even the basic concepts like color or form are all based on our descriptions and measurements of the world.
  However, it is also well-known that illusions10 are a common factor in our sense perceptions. Artists can design still pictures in certain ways that make the observer believe that graphics in the picture are moving. Looking at the same sculpture or painting from different angles can leave completely different, even opposite impressions. It is not only our eyes that trick us. In fact, every one of the five major senses—vision, smell, touch, taste and hearing—can give us misunderstandings about the world. Using the same logic, a question came to my mind—if I take a step back and confirm that I am in fact experiencing reality, is there a way to make sure that I am experiencing this reality correctly and completely? How can I know if my past experiences, aka11 my memories, are real? Can the fallibility12 of our sense perceptions hinder us from ever knowing what is true and what is not?
  There is a saying that “you are alone in your brain.” As I mentioned before, from my perspective, there is no way to truly confirm objective reality, because we are inside whatever reality this is. We can easily be living in a computer simulation made by creatures with a higher level of intelligence. The universe can just be a big black box with models of planets inside, with the other creatures occasionally peeking inside our little lives when they are bored.
  Of course, not knowing whether we live in reality doesn’t mean that we absolutely must not be living in reality. But this brings us to a struggle between choosing to continue what we are doing in our comfort zones and pursuing an ultimate “reality” we can never truly find.
  Honestly speaking, even if someone confirmed to me that the world I am living in right now is not reality, it would be hard to let go. How is it worth it to give up my family, my friends and even my enemies who make my not-so-perfect life so interesting and worth living? How many of us really have the courage to start another life all over again for something so vague and distant as “truth”?13   The funny thing is, maybe we don’t have to make a decision after all. Maybe there is no conflict between pursuing truth and staying comfortable where we are. In fact, pursuing truth is an essential part of living comfortably in this reality. I don’t like the argument that humans exist just to reproduce and reproduce and reproduce. I believe that we exist because we keep seeking things—things beyond what we can perceive and things even beyond what we can imagine. Subjective reality is so tempting for us because we try our very best to figure out and analyze every single piece of this world in order to lead better lives and fulfill our own curiosity. It is this desire to seek further and better that keeps us going. As for now, we are seeking objective truth, which in my limited understanding is unachievable. This doesn’t mean we should stop seeking “what’s next.” In fact, it doesn’t even matter if we are not in reality—I don’t care if I am just a lunatic inside of my own brain. As long as I am thinking and pursuing, as long as I am experiencing, then the journey is worth it.
  1. protagonist: 主角,主要人物。
  2. simulate: 模仿,假裝。
  3. shatter: 粉碎,打碎。
  4. anecdote: 轶事,奇闻。
  5. 事实上,我永远都不会知道我周围的世界是否只是电影中的一个场景,而其中的每个人是否只是合作演出的机器人。
  6. 在成长的过程中我做过许多无比真实的梦——梦醒时分,我困惑而震惊地对着墙发呆,分不清刚刚的经历到底是真实存在还是南柯一梦。differentiate: 区分,区别。
  7. lunatic: 疯子,疯人。
  8. substantial: 大量的,实质的。
  9. sense perception: 感官知觉 ,感知。10. illusion: 幻觉,错觉。
  11. aka: =also known as,又名,亦称。
  12. fallibility: 易误,不可靠。
  13. 到底有多少人会愿意为了虚无缥缈的所谓真理放弃原有的生活,从零开始?
  我叫王禹静,高中在读,热爱写作,最大的愿望是能用文字留得往事成回忆。小时候脑子里莫名出现过一个想法:如果我只是个活在梦境里的人怎么办?十几年过去,我纠纠结结还是没能找到这个问题的答案。反过头来细想,这个问题本来就无解,生活的快乐和延续也并不需要建立在它的对错之上。旅行的意义不是终点,而是旅行本身。生命可能就是一场盛大的旅行吧……
其他文献
正所谓学习的最高境界是学什么像什么。至于语言学习,恐怕其最高境界是你一开口,就能让人误把你当作native speaker。试问一下,你现在做到了吗?如果做到了,那么恭喜你,语言学习得很到位;如果没做到,也不用担心,这里其实有很多小技巧呢!
国内洗发水品牌的企业市场环境进一步恶化,日子是越来越难过了。  据不完全统计,宝洁和联合利华两家企业在洗发水行业已经占据接近80%的市场份额,而以舒蕾、霸王、蒂花之秀、拉芳、采乐、好迪、奥妮等品牌为代表的国内几十个品牌只能瓜分剩余的20%的市场,竞争之惨烈可见一斑!  再放眼看看整个日化行业,总体上也是这样一个局面。据行业协会的相关数据表明,2009年行业增长率将保持在13%左右,未来增长趋势短期
研究发现,一些帕金森症患者会变身为艺术家,他们表现在艺术创作中的才能令人吃惊,而之前多数人都很少接触艺术。医学专家认为,与多巴胺相关的帕金森症治疗用药在其中起了关键作用,它可以将某些患者潜在的艺术创作天分激活。一些帕金森症患者很享受投身于艺术创作的生活,在艺术创作中,他们更加关注内心生活和外部世界,由此开启了人生幸福的新篇章。
这篇短文是《麦肯锡季刊》“抛砖引玉”栏目的文章之一,该栏目邀请一些嘉宾就当前的重要事件发表各种观点。请您在阅读了作者的文章后,登录《麦肯锡季刊》中文网(china.mckinseyquarterly.com)写下您的评论,与大家分享您的想法。  去年9月,当 Ken Lewis 宣布将辞去美洲银行 CEO 一职时,他表示:“到了将接力棒交到公司新一代领导人手里的时候了”。但是,却有这样一个问题:这
蓝色巨人的领舞者  彭明盛    彭明盛把IBM全球PC业务卖给联想之后,着实卸下了肩上最沉重的一个包袱。  自2001年以来,IBM的首席执行官彭明盛为了重振IBM的服务部门,投放到研发领域的资金超过10亿美元,进行了17项收购活动,并决定出售连年亏损的PC部门。立竿见影,2005年第四季度,IBM的净利润同比增长10%以上,超过了华尔街的预期。  整齐的短发、娃娃脸、加上一副圆圆的眼镜,55岁
摘 要:非故事类文本题材丰富,条理清晰,语言精准,对于小学生而言极具阅读价值。本文从情境链、问题链及活动链驱动的角度出发,结合具体教学案例,探讨如何实施小学中年级非故事类文本阅读教学。  关键词:情境链;问题链;活动链;非故事类文本;阅读教学前言  在小学英语阅读教学中,故事类文本以其鲜明迥异的人物形象,生动起伏的故事情节,浅显易懂的语言表达,藏理于文的育人价值等为学生所喜闻乐见。在阅读教学中,关
  
作者 张鸣语录    1、我们的官员,一般来说,面皮都比较薄,听不得不同意见,尤其是在公开场合发表的意见,无论如何都会脸红心跳,进而怒不可遏,跳到半空,也不是不可能的。  2、地方政府公司化,在改革之初,也许还有点正面价值,但是到了今天,已经成了危及政府形象和公信力的最大祸首。如果一个政府部门把纳税人赋予的公权力当成捞钱的凭据,公开公司化经营公共事务,怎么有利润就怎么办,人们将会怎样看待这个政府?
如果你现在下岗了,你最想做的当然是找工作。不过你必须考虑到如下因素:
爱因斯坦:为天才代言