论文部分内容阅读
对“信念之谜”的解答依赖于去引号原则和信念融贯性原则,而去引号原则受到主体信念之审慎性和真诚性的双重约束,可能出现的不审慎或不真诚的信念态度与不融贯的信念相结合,会导致“信念之谜”的难解。如果说主体信念受到合理性的信念融贯性原则约束,那么信念语境中的语句意义和信念指示词的指称会出现多重的不确定性,融贯性原则的这种不确定导致了合理性的不确定性。然而,可以运用维特根斯坦的“遵守规则悖论”和戴维森的合理性概念,对合理性的这种不确定性进行反向约束,从而保证合理性在某种程度上的确定性。
The answer to “the mystery of faith ” depends on the principle of quotation marks and the principle of belief coherence, while the principle of quotation marks is subject to the double restraint of the prudence and sincerity of the subject’s conviction and the possible unscrupulous or unfaithful belief attitude In combination with inconsistent beliefs, this can lead to the inadmissibility of “the mystery of faith.” If the subject’s beliefs are constrained by the principle of reasonable consistency of beliefs, there are multiple uncertainties in the meanings of the sentences in the belief context and the denotations of the belief directives, and this uncertainty in the coherence principle leads to rationality The uncertainty. However, Wittgenstein’s “compliance with the paradox of rules” and Davidson’s concept of rationality can be used to reversely constrain this uncertainty of rationality so as to ensure some degree of certainty of rationality.