论文部分内容阅读
童家贤等同志在《南京航空学院学报》总第42期上发表了“板材、型材压缩性能试验研究”一文。在板材压缩试验方面,作者做了大量有益的工作,有些是创造性劳功,这是应该肯定的,是值得学习的。但文中确有一些问题值得商榷,下面仅就有关0.065mm薄箔的试验谈一些看法。 作者以厚度为0.065mm薄箔的压缩试验,作为自己试验研究达到的水平的标志,并感到满意。读者虽然没有看到试验的真实情况及其原始自动记录和有关数据,但仔细分析文章,也还是能够看出问题的。这里提出四点意见同童家贤等同志商榷。
Tong Jiaxian and other comrades in the “Journal of Nanjing Institute of Aeronautics,” the first 42 published “sheet, profile compression performance test” article. In the sheet compression test, the author has done a lot of useful work, some of which are creative labor, which should be affirmed and worth learning. However, there are indeed some problems that are debatable in the text. Just a few comments on the test on 0.065mm thin foils are given below. The author, with a compression test of 0.065 mm thick foil as a sign of the level achieved by his own experimental study, is satisfied. Although readers did not see the actual situation of the trial and its original automatic records and related data, but careful analysis of the article, but also be able to see the problem. Four opinions put forward here are discussed with Tong Jiaxian and other comrades.