论文部分内容阅读
苏联科学既存在着许多明显的弊病与不足,同时也有其优势和精华所在。所以西方的物理学家和分子生物学家(或免疫学家)对苏联科学的评价就可能相去甚远。这是因为物理学,特别是理论物理学,被广泛认为是苏联科学的长项,而生命科学则不然。为了弄清人们对苏联科学的种种主观判断是否和定量的统计结果相一致,最近美国《科学家》周刊的研究人员对美国费城科学情报研究所(ISI)编录的《科学引文索引》(SCI)中1973～1988年收录的苏联科学论文及其引证情况进行了定量的引证分析研究,遴选出了苏联自然科学三个方
There are many obvious defects and shortcomings in Soviet science, but also its advantages and essences. So the evaluation of Soviet science by Western physicists and molecular biologists (or immunologists) may go a long way. This is because physics, especially theoretical physics, is widely regarded as a long-term project of Soviet science, while life sciences are not. In order to find out whether people's subjective judgments on Soviet science are consistent with quantitative statistics, researchers at the recent Weekly scientists in the Scientific Citation Index (SCI) published by the Institute of Scientific Information of Philadelphia (ISI) The Soviet scientific papers and quotations from 1973 to 1988 were quoted and analyzed quantitatively, and the three parties of Soviet Union Natural Science