作为一个年轻的女性批评家,杨晓帆对批评对象的选择多少有点出人意料。提起张承志的《心灵史》、路遥的《人生》、徐迟的《哥德巴赫猜想》,给人的第一感觉是,它们是男性的、政治的、社会的,值得被讨论却很难被辨明;提起《棋王》《你别无选择》,我们很容易瞬间调动一套知识来讲述它们,却往往感到那些关于它们的“常识”已经压缩了再讨论的空间。在文学研究中,异质、歧义丛生与太确定都会构成研究的难度,上述选题无疑具有挑战 As a young female critic, Yang Xiaofan’s choice of critics is somewhat surprising. Mentioning Zhang Chengzhi’s “Spiritual History”, Lu Yao’s “Life” and Xu Chi’s “Goldbach Conjecture” first gave the impression that they were men’s, political and social, and worth discussing Difficult to distinguish; Mentioned “Chess King” “You have no choice”, we can easily mobilize a set of knowledge about them, but often feel that their “common sense ” has been compressed and discussed space. In literary studies, heterogeneity, ambiguity and too much determination will constitute the difficulty of the study, the above topics undoubtedly challenged