论文部分内容阅读
再现是西方哲学和政治的传统主题,是深入现代性问题的门径,是后结构主义所质疑的主要对象,因而有“再现危机”一说。此外,它也牵动了文化研究的神经,涉及对文学艺术的界定。由于不存在绝对真理但生命又不能没有意义,再现将一再地被再现,被争论,人类在同时为可能和不可能的再现中挣扎并以挣扎的方式持存。在本访谈中,我们看到,科尔布鲁克对后结构主义之德勒兹式的解读是再次加剧了再现与被再现的对立(如果其缝合无从保证成功的话);不过,这也引发了我们对当代哲学和文化研究诸多问题例如“语言论转向”的重新思考。
Reproduction is the traditional theme of Western philosophy and politics. It is the gateway to deepening the problem of modernity and the main object of post-structuralism’s quest. Therefore, there is a “crisis of reproduction”. In addition, it also affects the nerve of cultural studies and involves the definition of literature and art. Since there is no absolute truth but life can not be meaningless, reproduction will be repeated again and again, debated, and human beings are struggling and struggling in the meanwhile for the possible and impossible reproduction. In this interview, we see that Kolbuk’s interpretation of post-structuralist Deleuze once again aggravates the opposition between reproduction and being reproduced (if it is impossible to ensure success in stitching it); however, it also triggers us Rethinking many issues in contemporary philosophical and cultural studies, such as “Linguistic Turn ”.