本文通过考察亚里士多德在《论动物的运动》中的相关论述,试图从心理学和生物学两个层面重构他的欲望—普纽玛—行动模型,并由此指出“普纽玛”在欲望导致行动的过程中,在物理层面上起到了重要的联结作用。这种解释模型为亚里士多德突破身心二元论的传统思路、结合物理层面的因素来说明人类行动者的心理过程提供了关键支持。在此基础上,本文考察了戴维·查尔斯对亚里士多德的思路所做的评论并试图回应可能招致的批评,由此捍卫查尔斯对亚里士多德的解读与辩护。本文认为,尽管亚里士多德在《论动物的运动》中对普纽玛的说明仍存在含混之处,但是他所持的这种心理物理学路线在今天仍然能为我们研究人类行动者的道德心理提供重要启发。 By examining Aristotle’s related discourse in “On the Movement of Animals”, this paper attempts to reconstruct his desire - the normal-new-action model from two aspects of psychology and biology, and points out that “ Newma ”played an important physical link in the process of desire-led action. This interpretation model provides the key support for Aristotle’s traditional thinking of breaking through the dualism of body and mind and combining the physical factors to illustrate the psychological process of human actors. On this basis, the article examines David Charles’s comments on Aristotle’s ideas and attempts to respond to possible criticisms, thereby defending Charles’s interpretation and defense of Aristotle. This paper argues that although Aristotle is still ambiguous about Purbumar in his article on the Movement of Animals, his psychophysical approach today still allows us to study the role of human activists Moral psychology provides important inspiration.