论文部分内容阅读
离婚案件中“小三”问题引起社会和法律界关注,现行《婚姻法》及之后出台的三部《婚姻法》司法解释中,对于第三者问题都有相关规定。然而面对纷繁复杂的现实生活,司法实践中,对于此问题的规定不明确、不全面、操作性不强、有时甚至会出现“真空地带”。本文通过对一起典型案例的分析,针对在第三者介入的情况下财产的分割、重婚罪的认定,以及合法婚姻当事人如何向第三者主张权利等问题进行研究,并分析我国现行法律存在的不足,提出完善立法的建议。
In the case of divorce, the issue of “small three” has aroused the concern of the society and the legal community. In the current “Marriage Law” and the subsequent judicial interpretation of the three “Marriage Laws”, there are provisions on the third party issue. However, in the complicated real life, in the judicial practice, the provisions on this issue are not clear and comprehensive, and the operability is not strong, and sometimes the “vacuum zone” may appear. By analyzing a typical case, this paper studies the division of property, the identification of bigamy and the claim of third party by legal marriage parties in the case of third party intervention, and analyzes the existing law of our country Insufficient, put forward suggestions to improve the legislation.